Search for: "PERSON v. STATE" Results 941 - 960 of 84,677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Literally every person who had TPS in 2016 remains eligible for it today, after the Biden administration essentially abandoned any defense of the Trump-era terminations last summer. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of proceeding is… [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
"On March 20, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Mario Cuomo, the then Governor of the State of New York issued Executive Order 202.8, which required nonessential businesses to "reduce [their] in-person workforce at any work locations by 100% no later than March 22 at 8 p.m. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
If you cannot join in person, please feel free to connect via WebEx (Meeting number: 2743 583 3394; Password: PJsPnUBt472). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
These persons do not assert that the state may not subject anyone to the harsher form of detention, nor even--as they would have to assert in a SDP case--that the state must satisfy strict scrutiny in order to place someone in the harsher form of detention. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
THE CAUSE RIGHT NOW IS UNDER INVESTIGATION AND AND TAKING A LOOK NOW AT THE SUPREME COURT, THIS MORNING, TODAY MARKS TWO YEARS SINCE THE DOBBS DECISION THAT STRUCK DOWN ROE V WADE AND PAVED THE WAY FOR RESTRICTIONS IN SEVERAL STATES. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:30 pm by Angela Alloju
S. 271, which reaffirmed that Congress may choose to tax either the partnership or the partners on the partnership’s undistributed income, even where state law did not allow the partners to personally receive the income; and Helvering v. [read post]