Search for: "Parent v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 13,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:41 am
After the December oral argument in Lozano v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
See, e.g., Ormandy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Groch v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:08 pm
The wrongful-death case, Scott Corey Kirton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:57 am
Rather, the parents’ rights “must be balanced against ‘the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 8:55 am
It also documents a rising campaign that relies on parents’ rights to promote traditional views of gender identity and resist state intrusions into the family sphere. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his Order in Li v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
The State must prove, under the first prong of the best interests test, that “[t]he child’s safety, health or development has been or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:36 pm
"Stuard v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
See Robert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
Thus, stated preferences are not conclusive but must be considered in applications for modification. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
Previously, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in Kujawinski v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
