Search for: "People v Court"
Results 941 - 960
of 61,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
The California Supreme Court should grant review and make a final decision as to which position should prevail. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
They don't necessarily want to wait until the California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
[I am one of the relatively few people who think the Court got both cases right.] [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:29 am
People shouldn't be in limbo for eons. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States released their opinion on Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:34 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
One of the less discussed cases on the 2016 Supreme Court docket is Musnuff v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
I actually can fathom how the Court comes to this result. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Additionally, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ decision in the case of People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 8:22 am
A non-attorney town court justice has been admonished for misconduct by the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct from March 13, 2016 to March 28, 2016, with respect to People v David VanArnam, a matter then pending in the Canton... [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:14 pm
Continue reading The post Advice on Avoiding Probate from Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:41 am
Perhaps no decision has been more eagerly anticipated this year by employment lawyers than the Supreme Court's opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
They Are (Except in Court)–Reflex v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
In short: telling the trial court to get on the stick. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
In April, 2008 the Court of Appeals in People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), held that only a judge, and not prison or court clerks can impose Post Release Supervision [PRS], even when sentencing courts failed to pronounce PRS as required by law. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm
The appellate court also reiterated that people often reduce their expenses during a divorce because of lack of income, but the court should look at the necessary expenses at the time of separation (meaning during the marriage). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
The stigma of racial discrimination was raised at the argument before the Supreme Court in Fulton v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:32 pm
No, the court did not release the final version of the opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
As the Court of Appeal makes clear. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:39 am
Three of the Justices in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
