Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” FCC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
He trumpeted his Fellowship as “the obvious pitch-perfect sequel to The Lord of the Rings” in a letter he sent to Tolkien’s grandson of all people. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
(Lord Evershed, M. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Bush, Hamdan v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
Democratic bodies may represent the people, but they have a distinct identity which may need protecting. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
See Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd. [2001] QB 201. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
People should think about their own conduct. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
It’s been gnawing at me lately for some reason: Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:32 am
Lord Pannick suggested shortly before the election that prisoners may be entitled to around £750 compensation if denied the vote. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
’ As his Supreme Court audition, Lord Reed could not have asked for better than Axa General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46, the first challenge to the Scottish Parliament’s legislative competence to reach the Court since it succeeded the JCPC as devolution’s final arbiter. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
That is one of the issues that Madam Justice Fitzpatrick was asked to decide in Tassone v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
However, the court has done no more than confirm the basic principle that human rights are for all, not just for people we like. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
The article, which appeared in The People, had wrongly alleged she was to be investigated over allegations of slavery. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Hysteria broke out across the Europhobic tabloid press with the judges being dubbed “the enemies of the people”. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
For instance, in Gosford Park I knew who the murderer was, but I had to see the film three times before I knew why various people were under suspicion, or who was married to whom. [read post]
