Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 4:27 am
People live in boats. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:27 am
People live in boats. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
Some of the social reversals included the lords of the house serving the slaves. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Lord Puttnam said: “The amendments in my name and the names of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd, and the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Scotland, do exactly what they say on the tin. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Copyright is like theft and, on the authority of a dictum of Lord Browne-Wilkinson's in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669, stolen property is subject to a constructive trust in favour of the rightful owner. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
In order to be able to stop other people using the idea (without asking the person who first had it) the idea must have been new, and must not have been too easy for other people (even people who knew a lot about the area of the idea) to have arrived at, at the time when we first asked to be allowed to stop other people from using it without asking. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:11 pm
Around 20,000 people watch each month. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
(See Rogers v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
My involvement in the upcoming Vilardell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:47 pm
Mountford The main reason why licenses for residential occupiers are, in most cases, not an option, is the House of Lords case of Street v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
” (Storing, v. 5, pg. 105) Governments, no matter how they claim to derive their legitimate powers, have a tendency to expand beyond their proper bounds at the expense of the people’s individual rights. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
It seems the judge made repeated references to the crime’s spiritual effrontery: They “didn’t just steal money from people. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am
’ [57] The Court of Appeal noted that in R v Brown [2011] EWCA Crim 2571 Lord Judge CJ had reached a similar conclusion: ‘[I]t is difficult to see how a criminal act of distribution or circulation of a terrorist publication with the specific intent, or in the frame of mind expressly required as an essential ingredient of this offence to encourage or assist acts of terrorism, can be saved by reference to the principle of freedom of speech, unless that principle is… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Most people would note that copyrighted works show a remarkable consistency in pricing: iTunes, for example, has a very narrow range of prices for digital song downloads. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am
Henchmen, under orders of Lord Halifax, stormed into Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
