Search for: "People v. Utter"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Court of Appeals, Brunner v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
(United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
Supreme Court’s infamous 5–4 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:51 am
We have 326 million people. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Case is C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v Kosan Gas A/S, formerly BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling under from the Danish Højesteret [the IPKat interjects to add that, since the Danes are so good at speaking other languages, it is easy to forget that they speak Danish too: Højesteret is the Danish for 'Supreme Court' and is not, as Merpel mischievously tells people, a tasty dessert]. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
The court also rejected the employee’s assertion that the manager told him that “Indian people smell like onions,” noting the manager flatly denied ever making such a comment. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
Whether the New Zealand courts will be as cooperative has yet to be seen.While us little people were spending out time bemoaning SOPA/PIPA, the might of the United States was being applied to far bigger, far more important issues. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
”[v] Lawyers do, indeed, agree to limit the exercise of some First Amendment rights for the privilege of practicing law. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:00 am
From us you learn the state of your nation, and especially its management by the people you elected to give your children a better future. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
If they comport with transitory popularity, nothing more matters, and New York at a state does not want people carrying guns. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Watson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
You know, there’s different people say different things. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
Other people just can't do it. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
Last Thursday, New York's intermediate appellate court in People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
