Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 50,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am by David Hart QC
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:13 pm
 Notice that wasn't given here.So now the state will get notice. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
  High Desert State Prison -- where he's currently incarcerated -- seems about the right place for him. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
 And, in the United States, that totally works.But what if the person flees to Mexico? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Shaw v Reno As a result of the 1990 census, North Carolina became entitled to a 12th seat in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm by NCC Staff
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am by Michael C. Dorf
Rahimi, rejecting a Second Amendment challenge to a federal statute forbidding firearms possession by people subject to domestic violence protective orders; and Dep't of State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm by Geneviève Lay
The Facebook Name Policy states: Facebook is a community where people use their real identities. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Anderson and the Ohio deadline law involve), or how votes are counted and used to allocate electors (at issue in Nebraska), variations among states guarantee that voters in some states are not treated the same way as are voters in others states, even though who is elected President affects people in each and every state. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
In light of recent comments, questions, and Facebook posts, I thought I’d take a moment to clarify some misconceptions about the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:32 pm
Those people often as a matter of law similarly lack the mental state to incur criminal liability. [read post]