Search for: "Perry v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
In Perry et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
”; “marriage is widely regarded as the definitive expression of love and commitment in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
In Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Next Steps in the United States There is little doubt that, at some point, Perry v Schwarzenegger will end up in front of the US Supreme Court for a final analysis. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
It’s almost here . . . the Senate vote to confirm Elena Kagan as the 112th Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
United States, Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
McCready v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
Perry that an outstanding balance has been transferred to her new account. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
Perry that an outstanding balance has been transferred to her new account. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
McCready v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm
The case that gave the Justices the greatest difficulty was Perry v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm
… This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
And of course, if Perry v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
However, in light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Padilla v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
