Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 941 - 960 of 178,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If the Crown cannot reach a negotiated settlement within six months, they must exercise discretion to “compensate the Superior plaintiffs. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff King Sykes LLC owned a parcel of land in Chicago’s Bronzeville neighborhood. [read post]
This article was originally published on January 16, 2024 on JMBM’s ADA Compliance & Defense Blog. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm by John Ross
It's Juvenal's ago-old question: Who watches the watchmen? [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Dylan Gibbs
The plaintiffs say it’ll be the largest antitrust settlement in Canadian history (as long as it gets court approval).311: The number of paragraphs in today’s unanimous Supreme Court of Canada judgment, which looks to be the longest majority judgment the Court has ever issued. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm by Christine Corcos
Narrative Introductions, which employ multiple narrative techniques to paint a more complete and persuasive picture of the plaintiffs factual or legal contentions, seek to persuade the reader from the outset that the plaintiffs claims are worth paying attention to. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Narrative Introductions, which employ multiple narrative techniques to paint a more complete and persuasive picture of the plaintiffs factual or legal contentions, seek to persuade the reader from the outset that the plaintiffs claims are worth paying attention to. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
Stinnie (Oct. 8) – Whether a plaintiff who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of receiving an award of attorney’s fees, when there is no final ruling on the merits of the plaintiffs claim. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:24 am by Leslie Francis
” But it may portend more about the current Court’s predilection to reign in the federal government, also shown in the decisions overruling Chevron deference and allowing challenges to regulations by plaintiffs injured long after the regulations were finalized. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:40 am by James W. Ward
The Plaintiff argued that, at the core of this case, Proposition 22 conflicts with this constitutional provision by removing app-based drivers from the workers’ compensation system and limiting the Legislature’s authority to extend benefits to app-based drivers in the future. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:29 am by Eric Goldman
” the court rejects the plaintiffs attempts to overcome this: Defendants’ “guidelines” do not promote illegal content. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:28 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
(Colo.) granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs – trade groups precluding the defendants from enforcing Colorado’s opt-out statute (which became effective on July 1) and usury laws as to out-of-state, state banks making loans outside Colorado to Colorado residents.... [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:12 am by Bob Hoffer
However, the injunction was limited to the plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenors, without a nationwide scope. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Justin Hendrix
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the decision by the Fifth Circuit, finding that the plaintiffs did not have standing to bring the case, since the evidence failed to connect any specific moderation decision by the platforms to inappropriate government influence. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff loses on this point because TW's complaint does not implicate the kind of constitutional right that would abrogate sovereign immunity and allow test-takers like TW to bring this case. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
But now, more than fifteen years later, a new case out of Louisiana is challenging the prevailing view that copyright termination can only result in a recapture of U.S. rights, and—at least for now—the court seems to be buying the plaintiffs’ argument. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:21 am by Vineesha Sow
” The Texas Court was not persuaded by the FTC’s argument and granted the plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, but applicable only to the plaintiff. [read post]