Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:23 am
In Schweiker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
In Parents Involved, which the Court decided with its companion case, McFarland v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:23 pm
v=Fgb4R78LurE. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:32 am
Justice Fischer has recused himself from this case, and Judge Stephen Powell of the Twelfth District Court of Appeals will sit for him on the appeal. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
That’s twenty-seven decisions, beginning with Powell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
For example, in J.E.B. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
(The canonical citations would be Harlan's dissent in Poe v Ullman, Lawrence v Texas, Justice Powell's plurality in Moore v City of East Cleveland, etc). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:27 am
Powell, 271 S.C. 183, 246 S.E.2d 233 (1978). [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:29 am
Powell Jr., and Hugo L. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:20 am
Judge Batchelder’s unanimous opinion (Donald and Cole joining) in Thomas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
Powell, Jr. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
Estate of Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Goldsmith v Bissett-Powell, heard on 13 January 2022 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:51 am
Powell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
Second, following Justice Lewis Powell’s influential opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
