Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 941 - 960 of 18,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2007, 11:35 am
PSKS, Inc., No. 06-480, an antitrust case involving resale price maintenance. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:12 pm by Tom Smith
Deficit was already growing pre-COVID19 crisis Current employment dislocation compared to 2009 Is the Fed's monetary policy what's driving the V-shaped recovery in stock prices? [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 8:14 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The fact that the sale in Starways Trading v Pearl Island Trading was said to be ‘ex-warehouse’ was not a provision to the contrary. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:54 pm by Tom Smith
Conventional DC wisdom says Republicans are about to pay a heavy political price for supporting the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:33 am by Carl Neff
In the latest of a wave of appraisal opinions issued in Delaware, on August 1st, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the highly-publicized DFC Global appraisal ruling, in DFC Global Corporation v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Take, for example, Sieger v Zak in which each side challenged the adequacy of the other’s expert disclosure in a case involving damages claims arising from a shareholder buy-out. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:55 pm
 Which, happily, wins.The USPS has leased a branch post office in Bellevue, Washington for 50 years, pursuant to a lease that requires a specified amount of rent and an option for the USPS to buy the property -- at various diminishing prices over time -- at the end of the lease.After the 50 years was up, the USPS elected to buy the property for the specified $300,000 purchase price. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
”# # #SOURCEMcDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week on Capitol Hill and the Washington D.C. area, the Supreme Court grants the petition in Iancu v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:13 am
On the question of whether a tax avoidance motive is necessary before invoking transfer pricing provisions, the Philips Software v. [read post]