Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:21 am
Well over a year since the United States Patent and Trademark Office upheld a few claims of Apple's "rubberbanding" (or "overscroll bounceback") U.S. patent, the European version of that patent has come under massive pressure. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
” Turning back to the Executive Branch, Silberman then suggested that it may turn out that the Justice Department would not release detainees who won release orders issued by the courts, “because no other country will accept them and they will not be released into the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
The United States had agreed to comply with the ICJ as its obligation under an international treaty. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:25 am
United States, WL 2368661 (2012) (Scalia, J. dissenting) (citing and quoting Hinderlider v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo In a 10-3 decision today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a trial court injunction against President Trump’s revised travel ban executive order, temporarily barring citizens of six Muslim-majority nations from entering the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services had denied a doctor’s application to adjust his status to a lawful permanent resident, finding him ineligible. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:53 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
Rogers Communications Inc (Michael Geist) Czech Republic Pirate Party launches ‘Facebook’ for movies (TorrentFreak) Germany Apple wins (again) in Germany: Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction upheld (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) (Class 99) Samsung’s German lawyer agrees with Apple on the purpose of patent enforcement (FOSS Patents) Cologne Regional Court rules ISP not responsible when subscribers infringe copyrights in dispute between EMI and ISP HanseNet… [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
” He then explained how standing issues complicate the United States’ potential to accommodate European demands for judicial redress for data collection. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
United Kingdom, at paras. 46-49; repeated in Kalogeropoulou and Others v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
