Search for: "Rock v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 1,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:10 am by Conor McEvily
Chieftain, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights recently issued a decision that conflicts with the 2005 decision in Castle Rock v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
State of play When all this began in March 2010 – the same day President Obama signed the legislation, both Virginia and the Florida-led multi-state coalition filed complaints in federal court – mainstream pundits dismissed the challenges as legally frivolous, politically motivated sour grapes. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm by Phillip V. Marano
Marano and Liubov Ebralidze, First Circuit Prescribes eBay Injunction Treatment For Trademark Cases, WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW DAILY, June 17, 2011.Comment:This article briefs a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit re a motion to preliminarily enjoin alleged trademark infringement in Voice of the Arab World v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And this brings us  to somewhere between a rock and a hard place, called, appropriately,  Carnduff v Rock [2001] EWCA Civ 680. a) The Carnduff dilemma Here, a police informant sought compensation from the police force for failure to indemnify him for certain services. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by Marie Louise
Eircom (TorrentFreak) Ireland set to force ISPs to disconnect pirates (TorrentFreak) Malaysia Malaysia, ISPs, pirate content and the power of the hacking community (IP Komodo) New Zealand Proposed NZ software patent ban goes mainstream (Patentology) Sweden Torrent site throws in the towel fearing arrests (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Round two of the English leg of the international patent battle before EWHC (Pat): Summary judgment and costs: come back and argue, says judge: Nokia… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:11 pm
Restoril® capsules had been sold in the United States in 15 mg and 30 mg dosages more than a year before the priority date of the '954 patent. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm by Bill Merkel
   Section 1 clause 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm by David Rossmiller
  In the United States, how innocent co-insureds are treated varies. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Kevin
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:30 am by Kevin
For more on this topic, including the story of the one published legal opinion involving moon-rock ownership, see "United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]