Search for: "Rowe v. People" Results 941 - 960 of 1,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
For many people, a life in MCS is a more terrifying prospect than a purely vegetative existence. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In February 2009, S was convicted in Reading Crown Court for violent offences committed during an unprovoked attack on four people in September 2006. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
 He has previously blogged for HR in I on his work with the Texas Defender Service, which represents people on death row. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am by Jasmine Joseph
A Constitution for Everyone Bruce Ledewitz Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-20 Abstract Our Constitution is for everyone, but perhaps not in the way people assume. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:38 am by Tony Mauro
Stevens made it clear in his talk that he is still upset about the Supreme Court's March 29 decision in Connick v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
(International Transport Workers’ Federation v Viking Line ABP). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Terwilliger, 126 F.3d 34, 41 (2nd Cir. 1997).545 US 913, 961 (2005) (concurrence).For example, Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am by Graeme Hall
(An example could include increasing protections for older people; a topic which the Human Rights in Ireland blog considers here). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Just what Bradley worries people might find. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am by Melina Padron
In the courts: The Queen v Stephen Carter David Beswick Linda Mary Boyd Michael Gillespie-Doyle ??? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:09 am by Jonathan Bailey
The court, ruling in the case of John Wiley & Sons Inc v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The copyright is limited to those aspects of the work—termed `expression’—that display the stamp of the author’s originality,” quoting Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]