Search for: "Russell v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
Second, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now require a sentencing court, before accepting a guilty plea, to ensure that the defendant understands “that, if convicted, a defendant who is not a United States citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission to the United States in the future. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
United States, in which the Court ruled that a domestic-violence conviction is a misdemeanor crime of violence for purposes of limiting access to firearms. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
"From 1990 through 2002, for instance, the Canadian Supreme Court cited decisions of the United States Supreme Court about a dozen times a year, an analysis by The New York Times found. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
"From 1990 through 2002, for instance, the Canadian Supreme Court cited decisions of the United States Supreme Court about a dozen times a year, an analysis by The New York Times found. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Wong and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am
Barr (Monday, Nov. 4): Whether a lawful permanent resident who is not seeking to be admitted to the United States can be rendered inadmissible for purposes of the “stop-time” rule, which ends a period of continuous residence if someone commits an offense that would make him inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
Our United States Supreme Court in a case entitled Staub v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
Our United States Supreme Court in a case entitled Staub v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm
Russell Spivak and Ashley Deeks examined the state of affairs on drone regulations after the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
Evid. 803(6) and United States v Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
The Maine Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:00 am
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed that ruling in December. [read post]
