Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
ArsT took a look at the data, which shows Turkey took the place of top censor from the United States this time, requesting that 8,751 pieces of content be removed. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
ERISA preemption of severance agreements ARSENIO COLORADO, ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
United States District Judge Michael M. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm
The United States Supreme Court distinguished Robinson in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
After the strategy to force up the stock price failed, Edelman brought a series of unsuccessful lawsuits in France and the United States against the Taittingers seeking to wrest control of the company. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
I guess there are written or at least unwritten rules in the United States that would prevent this from happening in the first place. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:29 am
The decision of the NIGC, the federal agency charged with approving and disapproving management contracts under IGRA, is binding on lower courts unless successfully challenged in a United States District Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Covell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
” Although “manifest disregard of the law” is not stated as grounds to vacate an award in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act, the Court followed Sharp v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
The Act requires that more than three quarters of advanced biofuel sold in the United States after January 1, 2022 be cellulosic biofuel. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Not an "Offense" to Violate Supervised Release in the Ninth - Jensen and Sec. 3146
21 Jan 2013, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
Jan. 2, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a claim for violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:48 am
In Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]