Search for: "Sample v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
  To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites:  Blake v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by Josh Sturtevant
This is with a sample set approaching 6,000 at the time we published this piece. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:47 am
State and State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Aaron Tang
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by Ben Vernia
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]