Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 941 - 960
of 6,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am
Likewise, if the purchaser refuses to close, the seller can reverse the deal (with the seller becoming the purchaser), but he cannot force the purchaser to buy his interest. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 3:06 pm
The privity doctrine was abolished after the case of MACPHERSON V. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 10:33 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/5687/securities-industry-commentator/SEC Suspends Trading in Inactive Issuer Touted on Social Media (SEC Release)Statement of Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee on Contingent Settlement Offers (SEC Release)Amazon seller blasts the company's forced arbitration policy in congressional hearing on antitrust (CNBC by Lauren Feiner and Annie… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:51 am
Since 2018’s landmark South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In 2011, the seller declared the agreement null and void. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm
Ashkenazi v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:17 am
The case, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:47 am
[Monaghan v Gilsenan [2021] EWHC47 (Ch)] [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:04 am
As I explained early last month, the EU's purchasing decisions were wrong at any given point in time just based on then-available information (New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker)--and liability issues do not serve as an excuse, as it's simply a reality in a seller's market that not only prices but also other terms are impacted by the demand-supply discrepancy. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am
The buyer subsequently alleged that the seller had misrepresented its fee structure. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 8:18 am
Castillo-Sang v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
In Surf’s Up Legacy Partners, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:55 pm
The case is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v Amazon.com Services Inc 2020. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:10 am
It includes articles on: – An Extraordinary Course: Important Lessons from the Delaware Court of Chancery Decision in AB Stable VIII v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
The panel accordingly affirmed the entire judgment (Cavello Bay Reinsurance Ltd. v. [read post]
