Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 2:29 pm by Liskow & Lewis
  Attorneys, investment bankers and other advisors routinely refer to the study for trends in key legal issues that are prevalent in negotiated acquisitions of privately held companies in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. . . . [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
L. 311 (2013).CPIA import restrictions prohibit designated archaeological and ethnological objects from entering the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 6:50 am by jonathanturley
There is a vast difference between the United States sending a combat unit across the border and manufacturers who supply distributors who serve dealers who sell lawful products to consumers. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Wayfair, in which the justices voted last week to overrule two prior cases that prohibited states from requiring out-of-state retailers who don’t have a store or warehouse in the state to collect tax on sales to state residents, “a win for physical retailers and the landscape we should have where all sellers can compete evenly. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
” Famous cases in which the Court has held that speech was impermissibly compelled include: West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of California wasn’t buying it (JAE Properties, Inc. v AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC, 3:19-CV-02075 [SD Cal Feb. 9, 2024]). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am by Gibbons P.C.
Moss, United States Senate, then at the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission. [read post]