Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 4,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
The seven cases consolidated under the caption Zubik v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Cancellation of Removal for Permanent Residents CLIENT: Chinese (Green card holder) LOCATION: Cleveland Immigration Court in Ohio Our client came to the United States in 1991. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Earlier this year, however, a federal district court unsealed the cases of U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm by Daniel C. Kloke
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm by Daniel C. Kloke
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 pm by Moll Law Group
In the litigation, United States military veterans and service members have alleged they experienced hearing damage because they used 3M’s Combat Arms earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
On Monday the US Supreme Court [official website] added seven more cases [order list, PDF] to its October docket. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm by William Baude
The United States has filed an amicus brief taking a middle position. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison) or whether the President’s claim of Executive Privilege was correct (United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]