Search for: "Smith v. Day"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am
” Coons v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
” The court cited Greenlaw v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
See, e.g., Day v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:29 am
KGAA v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
Smith (1990). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Meanwhile, other intellectual property litigation has generally held steady or, as is the case in the patent arena, slowed down as challenges to patents have increased at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the wake of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act that took effect in 2012 and new restrictions on patentability set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Smith is vice president of litigation and strategy and Adav Noti is senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at the Campaign Legal Center, which filed an amicus brief in support of the states in Chiafalo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
The case is entitled Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
The date on which a conviction becomes final does not necessarily correlate with when the underlying crime allegedly occurred or even when the trial occurred.Suppose that Jones and Smith are each tried and convicted on the same day as one another for crimes they allegedly committed on the same day as one another. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
“When the summons requires appearance within 30 days after service, exclusive of the day of service (see Rule 101(d) ), the 30-day period shall be computed from the day the copy of the summons is left with the person designated by law and not from the day a copy is mailed, in case mailing is also required. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
“When the summons requires appearance within 30 days after service, exclusive of the day of service (see Rule 101(d) ), the 30-day period shall be computed from the day the copy of the summons is left with the person designated by law and not from the day a copy is mailed, in case mailing is also required. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
In Legacy Church v. [read post]
