Search for: "State of Minnesota v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 According to Allen, Toyota USA “sells Toyota Parts in the United States at prices substantially higher than those charged by Toyota in other places. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
Mich. 1993) (applying Minnesota law); Kanter v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
 D E C I S I O N Because, in this prostitution investigation, the government engaged in outrageous conduct in violation of the guarantees of due process in the United States and Minnesota constitutions when the investigating officer initiated and permitted the escalation of sexual contact that was unnecessary to any reasonable investigation, appellant’s conviction is reversed. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
In Nov. 2023, for example, the Minnesota Supreme Court threw out an attempt to remove Trump from that state’s ballot. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States, the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, and same-sex marriage. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:08 am by New Books Script
: critical reflections on the status of irregular migrants in Europe and the United States edited by Marie-Be? [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:18 am by Gregory Ablavsky
” Soon after, in 1999, the Supreme Court decided Minnesota v. [read post]