Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 1,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Erin Miller
        At a speech at Montana State University yesterday, Justice Scalia said that judges are not qualified to decide “the leading moral questions of the day” and that the big dividing line in the United States is between “those who believe [the Constitution] does not change and those who think it evolves. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by John Inazu
  One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:51 am by Erin Miller
In response to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 4:01 pm by Anna Christensen
United States now includes links to a number of new amicus briefs, and the page for Montana v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Richard Renner
In its noblest work, it seeks to make the law of the 50 united states more uniform by “restating” the law in a cogent organized work. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
The Court today also issued a brief, unanimous per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Erin Miller
Thomas No. 09-940, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Wachsmuth forthcoming Fall 2010) and the author of numerous law review articles on the topic of arbitration, several of which have been repeatedly cited to the United States Supreme Court and lower state and federal appellate courts. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:33 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-837): originally conference of 5.20.10 United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:04 am by Alison Rowe
 The conference had a record number of attendees--180 practitioners from all over the United States. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
Goord, (2d Cir., April 27, 2010), the 2nd Circuit remanded with instructions that plaintiff should be granted leave to amend his complaint that prison staff members violated his free exercise rights when they failed to provide him with an alternative method of tuberculosis testing consistent with his religious beliefs instead of placing him in confinement.In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am by Anna Christensen
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]