Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:03 am
See State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:11 pm
Second, it was not “uniform … throughout the United States,” because debtors that filed during 2018 paid millions of dollars more if they didn’t file in Alabama or North Carolina than they would have paid if they had filed in those states. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
To ensure the state’s roadways are safe, the North Carolina State Highway Patrol is positioning troopers every 20 miles along I-40. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Re the Supreme Court's June 11th opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:10 am
By Rob Cohen On Friday, May 3, a Federal District Judge in North Carolina enjoined the Trump Administration’s effort to change the immigration policy on “unlawful presence” as it is applied to foreign students, in Guilford College et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
Considering (2), the panel looked to the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:52 pm
United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003), and Justice Breyer's opinion for the Court does not actually use the word "nasty. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:50 am
This issue was resolved by the United States Supreme Court in 1979 in the noteworthy case of William Orr v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
In Jordao, the North Carolina Court of Appeals reviewed N.C.G.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am
Recent deaths on North Carolina roads reflect this trend. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Valeo and Citizens United. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
First, regarding vindictive prosecution, the higher court explained that North Carolina v. [read post]
