Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 941 - 960
of 37,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the Court found the agency’s decision to follow GAO’s recommendation to evaluate the protester’s proposal as though its key personnel was unavailable was irrational.[1] In this case, KPMG proposed Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
C 12-0195 PJH, 2012 WL 12964819, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
C 12-0195 PJH, 2012 WL 12964819, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm
United States, No. 2022-2248 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Civil Code Section 711 states that “[c]onditions restraining alienation, when repugnant to the interest created, are void. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Only one case, Sample v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:24 am
C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:46 am
The recent New Jersey Appellate Division case of Kotsogiannis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
§ l 56(c)(4) and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
Wyers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In June 2022, Parliament adopted a set of amendments, which, inter alia, allow Canada’s executive branch to seize or restrain property that is owned, held, or controlled by (a) a foreign State, (b) any person in that foreign State, or (3) a national of that foreign State who does not ordinarily result in Canada. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
§ 706(2)(A) , (C) . [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Last week’s decision by the Alabama Supreme Court in LePage v. [read post]
