Search for: "State v. Collins" Results 941 - 960 of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Hence, as a matter both of national law and of EU law, Schrems reinforces the argument that Collins was wrongly decided. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The US Supreme Court recently agreed to hear argument in Collins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This principle was also adopted in Canada, with the Supreme Court of Canada stating in 1978 in Elsley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:33 am
For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Virginia, eight other states and Puerto Rico (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the American Legion (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-849 Case name: Collins v. [read post]