Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Even if early constitutional disputants commonly appealed to the Constitution’s authority, their ways of doing so often betrayed radical disagreement over the very Constitution to which they were appealing: its character, how it should be interpreted, and its ultimate relationship to the sovereign people.The rival forms of constitutionalism that emerged from these fundamental divisions created the early republic’s defining fault lines. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:44 am
Believe it or not, eight years after the winds of Hurricane Sandy struck New Jersey, they’re still blowing through the state’s court system. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:44 am
Believe it or not, eight years after the winds of Hurricane Sandy struck New Jersey, they’re still blowing through the state’s court system. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In March 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down one of the most important decisions in modern copyright history: Campbell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
In so holding the Court overruled the 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:10 am
Bankruptcy Sale of Third Member’s Interest Leaves Remaining Two Members’ Ownership Percentages in Limbo A decision last month by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Ghatani v AGH Realty, LLC, involved an appeal from the trial court’s judgment declaring that Member #1 and Member #2 held 58% and 42% interests, respectively, in an LLC formed out of a joint venture to acquire and develop two vacant lots in Brooklyn. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
Here's the heart of the analysis, which I think is generally quite right; the key precedents that the court discusses are Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Fromageries Bel, owner of the MINI BABYBEL brand under which this shaped cheese is sold, appealed to the UK High Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In 2018, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) reversed the trial court's order denying Sony's anti-SLAPP motion, holding that the attribution of the songs to Michael Jackson "did not simply promote sale of the album, but also stated a position on a disputed issue of public interest. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:35 am
Whether the city would also violate the Free Exercise Clause, as interpreted in Employment Division v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
Under State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 pm
New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal First, the New York Court of Appeals decided Regina Metropolitan Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division rejected plaintiff’s argument the lump sum alimony calculation required the motion judge to include defendant’s share of the RSUs noting that the MSA clearly stated that [i]ncreases in [defendant’s] earned income shall reduce [plaintiff’s] alimony obligation. [read post]
