Search for: "State v. George" Results 941 - 960 of 6,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
The character "George Steinbrenner" repeatedly appears as George's boss; in one episode, Steinbrenner asks George to go to Cuba to recruit some of the country's best baseball players. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 12:08 pm
Supreme court granted Microsoft's petition for a writ of certiorari in Microsoft Corp. v AT & T Corp., No. 05-1056, proceedings below, AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
"On General Washington's 280th birthday, the Supreme Court will hear argument on whether a modern version of the latter provision is constitutional in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Chief Justice George:  What interpretation do you have of the State legislative history? [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, rulemaking without prior comment has increased across a wide range of agencies, a trend that may be strong enough to persist despite the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Norton valuably reminds us, for example, of the important inclusionary effect of President George W. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ngyuen, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 585 (18 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mayor of London v London Borough of Enfield [2008] EWCA Civ 202 (18 March 2008) LG (Italy) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 190 (18 March 2008) S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2008) Housden & Anor v The Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons [2008] EWCA Civ 200 (18 March 2008) Shah… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 1:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
We conclude by analyzing how the Supreme Court’s 2009 holding in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Venkat
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]