Search for: "State v. Hart " Results 941 - 960 of 1,154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 11:23 am by Jonathan Bailey
This is because, in 1989, the U.S. became a signatory to the Berne Convention, over 100 years after the first countries signed on, which states, under article five, that “the enjoyment and the exercise of [rights under the Convention] shall not be subject to any formality. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Text of the complaint and the proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
  Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
But, like Hochfelder, I believe that such obfuscation leads to more litigation as it leaves the current state of the law a mystery. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am by Meg Martin
Ruppert of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, WY.Representing Amicus Curiae Northern Cheyenne Tribe: John C. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
By Kate Hart In a decision filed on February 11, 2009, Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Hart A state appellate court has upheld the adoption of design guidelines that are intended to implement a City of Los Angeles redevelopment plan.PR/JSM Rivara LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
The action is notable because the acquisition has been consummated and the transaction was not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by Ed Felten
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]