Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 941 - 960
of 8,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
The press release stated that BCE had entered into an agreement with Canada Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:10 am
Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
The NHS Confederation's report states on page 9 that:"The USA objectives seek provisions on protection of intellectual property rights that reflect current USA legal standards, which are generally more favourable to rights holders than EU standards. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
SANA is an organization under New York State law with office holders spread across North America. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:35 am
S. law in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Mead v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 10:51 am
While I understand that SEP holders complain about "holdout" tactics by implementers, disputes sooner or later reach the point at which the parties have enough guidance from the courts to work out a portfolio license.After Huawei v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
The Public Domain in the United States just got smaller.In this Kat’s opinion, SCOTUS (The Supreme Court of the United States) picked quite an interesting time to release its opinion in Golan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Holder, 10-694, and Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:46 am
Supreme Court has granted cert in E.M.A. ex rel Plyler v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
The court, reversing the injunction and ruling against the trademark holder, found that the RISE label was a weak trademark because it strongly suggested the qualities of the product it labeled and there was extensive third-party usage of the same or similar marks (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 8:14 am
CLARK v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
United States, 530 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
" Lozano v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
” Monasky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
In Rosenberg v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:24 pm
§ 544(b), allowing recovery of a “transfer of an interest of the debtor in property” if state law criteria are met (though the state laws that this statute incorporates generally do refer to a transfer by the debtor). [read post]
