Search for: "State v. Holmes"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2009, 6:43 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:26 am
See, e.g., Holmes v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm
In fact, “Oliver Wendell Holmes” never served on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:26 pm
United States (1928) 277 U.S. 438, 470 (dis. opn. of Holmes, J.).) [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
Holmes talked at great length about Kennedy’s consenting opinion. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:12 am
The Court quoted from that opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: "The state...has the last word as to whether its mountains shall be stripped of their forests and its inhabitants shall breathe pure air. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
In Kalina v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
United States, 256 U.S. 335, 343 (1921) (Holmes, J.) [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
It was unconstitutional to retroactively apply Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) to a defendant who, at age 19, had pleaded guilty to a sex offense under a state diversionary statute, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled.In People v Temelkoski, the Michigan Supreme Court emphasized that, when prosecuting crimes, the state must adhere to the promises it makes to defendants who waive their right to a jury trial and plead guilty to a criminal offense under… [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
