Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 12:34 pm
Clark v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
” The court also instructed the parties that “[m]aking an adverse claim to a line item of property is not contemplated in year’s support. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
Some major cases like ProCD v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:43 pm
Here's his take on the underlying stuff, with citations omitted:"When a debtor files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, she is required to state her intentions with regard to any property which is subject to a security interest. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:57 pm
It appears that, currently, the sides drawn are currently Congress v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:01 am
After reading the opinion in a recent Tax Court case, Najafpir v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:19 am
Mink v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
In Craig v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
In Craig v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
It should not be necessary to consider each component of the duty on a local planning authority item by item. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The court addressed the disputed items and ordered the husband to pay the wife an equalization … Terasen Gas Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
In 2004, the Appellate Division took up that very issue in the matter of Landmark Properties v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:03 am
In Haynes v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
State Tax Comm’n, 28 N.W. 2d 799 (Iowa 1947), and Utilcorp United Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
State Tax Comm’n, 28 N.W. 2d 799 (Iowa 1947), and Utilcorp United Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
This generally hostile reception contrasts with the way many state supreme courts in the 1950s and 60s quickly adopted Berman v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
Italy’s Minister of Culture Gennaro Sangiuliano echoed this sentiment, expressing appreciation for the ruling and stating that “[i]t must be said that the use for commercial purposes for cultural goods must be paid while it must be free for images for educational and study purposes. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Committee managed to reduce the list to 25 items. [read post]
