Search for: "State v. Kelly "
Results 941 - 960
of 1,440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
BP failed on both counts at first instance but the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland decided that the marks were valid and enforceable and that trade mark infringement had occurred (BP Amoco plc v John Kelly Ltd [2002] F.S.R.5). [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:08 pm
(mem. op.); Kelly v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 11:24 am
Kelly v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:59 pm
Post-Script: The Kelly v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Considering the “serious nature” of the Supervisor’s misconduct, the court said that the penalty imposed, dismissal, did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 and Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
Since the 1993 decision of Daubert v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
” In Young v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:01 am
Markman, Mary Beth Kelly and Brain K. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:52 am
” ; Purdham, 637 F.3d at 429 (citing Todaro, 40 F.Supp. at 230); see also Benshoff v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:54 am
by: Kelly A. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
See Goldberg v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm
" Kelly v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
The case is State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
”7 The statute lists several categories of works which may be protected, including “(1) literary works; ;(2) musical works, including any accompanying words; ;(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; ;(4) pantomimes and choreographic works; ;(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; ;(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v ;Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
