Search for: "State v. L. B. T." Results 941 - 960 of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Subsection (b) is triggered by “[t]he filing of a suit against any employee of a 4 governmental unit” and bars a future suit “against the governmental unit. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence… [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
” He added that this proposal would also include graduates from two-year junior colleges and doctoral programs, stating: “I know of stories where people graduated from a top college or from a college, and they desperately want to stay here… and they can’t. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
R., 2017 QCCA 907 [6] L’appelante se pourvoit contre un verdict de culpabilité prononcé le 20 juin 2014 par un jury présidé par l’honorable Éliane B. [read post]