Search for: "State v. London" Results 941 - 960 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
  If the Supreme Court upholds the judgment of the Court of Appeal, it is likely to lead to greater efficiency in cross-border bankruptcy cases and possibly an increase in insolvency proceedings being launched in London due to its jurisdictional reach. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
”  Thus, the court overruled the objections of the objecting insurers and entered an Order that the assignment of rights in certain insurance policies to the asbestos trust is valid and enforceable, notwithstanding anti-assignment provisions in the policies.Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London and Certain London Market Companies, as well as another group of insurers, appealed to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant, Aizkir,… [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:29 pm by Michael
The notice was sent by fax and was received by Lehman Brothers' London office at 6.02pm. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am by Emma Boffey and Lorraine Walkinshaw
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (ZH &CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham; the Court ruled by a 5-2 majority that Newham and Lewisham were entitled to evict the appellants from the Housing Act 1996, s 188 accommodation without obtaining a court order. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am by David Smith
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am by David Smith
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am by Laura
He stated: “In my view the father’s presentation before me was sensible, honest and reliable…. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]