Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Lord Neuberger in the Court of Appeal went as far as to state as follows. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 2:16 am
Supreme Court The appeal was heard before the Supreme Court on 29 June before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
However, neither court commented on whether the EPO’s requirement that an overlapping range should have a technical effect is consistent with the UK novelty requirement established by Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham plc [2005] UKHL 59. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58R (on the application of Carmichael and Rourke) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of Daly and others) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of A)… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
One should do the work to convince the Tribunal that the criteria had been reached. 1255: Lord Leggatt asks when the Tribunal should consider compensation? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:06 am
In Christopher Simmons v Derek Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal amended the guidance given in the earlier judgment of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 by stating that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages in all civil claims for six specified heads of loss will be 10% higher than previously, unless the claimant falls within section 44(6) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (the Act).The… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:37 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that the fundamental principle of the common law of damages is the compensatory principle. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Comment Lord Walker concluded his judgment on the expenditure issue by confirming that the previous House of Lords decisions in this area (namely, Ensign Tankers and Barclays Mercantile) remain good law. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Mr Williams’s appeal and upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision, Lord Carnwarth giving the sole judgment. [read post]
