Search for: "State v. Mannering" Results 941 - 960 of 19,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
The Court was looking, however, at a state offense, and so had to look to the interpretation of state courts. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
The Court was looking, however, at a state offense, and so had to look to the interpretation of state courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 2:25 pm
The New York State Board of Elections, the New York County Democratic Committee, the New York Republican State Committee, and the Associations of New York State Supreme Court Justices in the City and State of New York (among others) have filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari seeking to appeal the case of Margarita Lopez-Torres v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
App. 6, 9 (1973)) (holding that because garnishment is a statutory cause of action, “a trial court must follow the manner in which the legislature has chosen for making a determination”); see also Carey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm by Dean Stowers and Nick Sarcone
 The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am by Brian A. Comer
As stated by the court:Under South Carolina law, punitive damages may be awarded to punish torfeasors who have acted in a "reckless, willful, or wanton" manner. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Seventh Circuit held that this decision was not only wrong but unreasonable, the AEDPA standard for overturning the state court judgment in this manner. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
These regulations treat state office digital campaign materials in the same manner as traditional campaign materials and do not put any extra burdens on candidates and their campaigns.In 2011, the judiciary flexed its social media wings in Griffin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
  Carr J stated in respect of this argument he would have concluded that the "shear variant" produced substantially the same result in the same way and obviously so as the patent states it is the preferred arrangement. [read post]