Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 941 - 960
of 19,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Von Holdt v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No injury marks on the hands show that the victim was not in a position of defending her body, as a natural reflex, from getting hurt by the train. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No injury marks on the hands show that the victim was not in a position of defending her body, as a natural reflex, from getting hurt by the train. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
In fact, in the cross-motions for summary judgment, the claimants stated that the use of a trade mark as a verb, i.e. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 5:45 am
From JD Supra: Last Spring, the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) with a 7-2 decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Simonian v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
When the response was that all of this missed the point, missed the mark of what the decision-makers would focus on, the reply was “no way. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Proof of acquired distinctiveness may be adduced for all Member States concerned, or separately for different Member States or groups of Member States. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:51 am
Jose Cuervo S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In Maier, it was stated: “[78] … the court must then consider a notional and fair use of that mark in relation to all of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 11:21 am
This 2-1 decision in Vanegas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Ltd V Aiwa Corp in the UK High Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Today marks the 87th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
