Search for: "State v. Murray" Results 941 - 960 of 1,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am by Ben Rubin
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm by Tom Crane
 A state distruct judge issued these sanctions in the case of Lester v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
Reding's press conf. on EU #Dataprotection Reform package livestreamed today at 12pm GMT+1 here: ow.ly/8F0S6 #privacy #CPDP2012 # Watch Vivian Reding's Press Conference at the European Commission live here as I will try to live stream it at… http://t.co/whmihIQV # Megaupload takedown reminds us why website terms and conditions can be important http://t.co/LxaQfRc9 # V. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
New York courts have consistently held that a breach of fiduciary duty claim that is premised on the same facts as the legal malpractice cause of action, is redundant and should be dismissed (E.g., Murray Hill Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
By way of perspective, several early 1800s American cases (I know of four published opinions, Ruggles, Updegraph, Kneeland, and Murray) upheld convictions for blasphemy of Christianity, sometimes based on similar facts: People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:25 am by Susan Brenner
Suing argues he revoked his consent when he stated `whoa’ to the deputies. [read post]