Search for: "State v. Owen" Results 941 - 960 of 1,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 9:53 am by Steven M. Gursten
Owens, noted the "trial court decided the matter on an issue not before the court at that juncture because defendant clearly conceded causation for purposes of [her] Kreiner [v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:10 am by Howard Wasserman
The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
Counsel stated that Philips "can introduce evidence, live evidence to this Court at trial. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:11 am by Michael Lowe
The United States Supreme Court is already considering Henry Skinner’s petition for certiorari (09-7784), which he filed after his 1999 petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Amarillo federal district court (Skinner v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm by Adam Wagner
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 624 (Fed. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:01 pm
"I think if the testing is allowed, it will give rise to a new habeas claim in the state courts," says Owen, co-director of the UT law school's capital punishment clinic. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Remington Arms Co., 563 N.E.2d 397, 407 (Ill. 1990) (punitive award reversed in light of good-faith metallurgical disagreement among experts); Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
Recourse loans exist alongside non-recourse loans which, as the name implies, offer the lender no recourse against the borrower beyond foreclosure of the mortgage instrument. [4] Typically, non-recourse loans offer a higher degree of risk, and therefore carry a higher interest rate to match. [5] The banks run the risk that owners will abandon properties which they can no longer afford in a poor state of upkeep, reducing the value of the home, and therefore the amount the bank will receive… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:45 am by palfrey
Alabama, Pruneyard, and other state action doctrine/shopping mall-type cases; the AP decision of 1945; Red Lion; Turner; Brand X; Carlin; AT&T v. the City of Portland; and so forth. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP)   Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46)   South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP)   Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline)… [read post]