Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 941 - 960 of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 11:47 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Cefetra BV, Cefetra Feed Service BV, Cefetra Futures BV and State of Argentina and Monsanto Technology LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
That's pretty good evidence that there really was something untoward going on in state court. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:43 am
Today's entry focuses on the rule's application in the Sixth Amendment right to counsel context in Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Our tasty tater tot of a case for today’s consumption is Lederman v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Larry Klein v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:45 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
From my colleague, Andrew Moratzka: On June 7th, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]