Search for: "State v. Raymond" Results 941 - 960 of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
Raymond Randolph wrote for the majority, joined by Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
The fall schedule: Tuesday, Sept. 6 Robbennolt, JD, PhD, the Guy Raymond Jones Faculty Scholar at the University of Illinois College of Law, is a nationally renowned expert in the areas of psychology and law, torts and dispute resolution. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
The late Harry Blackmun wrote, in dissent, in Herrera v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:20 am by Lyle Denniston
Raymond Randolph and Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:42 am by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
Members of the New Jersey Senate Economic Growth Committee: State Senator Raymond J. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]