Search for: "State v. Small"
Results 941 - 960
of 15,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Powell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
” The City determined this project was categorically exempt under the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 3 exemptions for “construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The City determined this project was categorically exempt under the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 3 exemptions for “construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Cruz is not only relevant to states where small amounts of marijuana is a civil offense, but also to states where medical marijuana is lawful. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:54 am
Representative V. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:18 pm
In Homa v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
If she had paid a small sum to her parents for her acquisition, a difficult question might have had to be faced, although, as at present advised, I think that her enrichment would still have been unjust, but the extent of any unjust enrichment would be reduced by the small sum. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
This is just one small example. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am
” Traversa v Freddi [2011] EWCA Civ 81: This case provides some key context to Agbaje v Agbaje in how the test ought to be applied. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
State, 2008 Ind. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 8:24 am
Case Citation: Kuhk v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
Third, citing Miami Herald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:57 am
State of New York, 96 A.D.2d 630, 631 [3rd Dept. 1983]; Senatore v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
