Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 941 - 960 of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman
The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision earlier this month in Hall v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:02 am by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, the court reversed the judgment of the Superior Court and remanded with direction to sustain the plaintiff’s appeal and to order the commission to hold a hearing on the plaintiff’s application. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm by Richard Frank
  The Monterey County Superior Court invalidated the measure, concluding that it was preempted by contrary, longstanding state law. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Sean Wajert
CTE sought dismissal on the grounds the state court lacked personal jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:25 pm by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:54 am
  Ending the lull, in a decision filled with different conflict of laws issues, the Quebec Superior Court held, in Bil’In Village Council and Yassin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 5:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
The applicable statute, OCGA § 5–6–35 (a) (1), provides that “appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of … state and local administrative agencies” must be brought by application for discretionary appeal. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:38 am by Douglas Melcher
On May 10, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Nader v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am by H. Scott Leviant
Superior Court (2004) 34 Cal.4th 319, 326, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 906, 96 P.3d 194; Ghazaryan v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:42 am
Water&rsquo;s Edge Associates, et al., Superior Court of the State of Washington for Clark County, Case No. 05-2-03446-1 (2008) is a good example of how, when allowed adequate discovery, an insurer was able to reveal to the court the true collusive nature of a covenant judgment between the insured and the injured party. [read post]