Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 941 - 960
of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
LEXIS 18624 (ND NY, Feb. 8, 2017), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a number of Muslim inmates that their 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when they were not allowed to attend Jumm'ah services on Dec. 25, 2015.In Taylor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
Taylor, 465 F.3d 174 (5th Cir.2006); Darby v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
More to come.......5) United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 8, 2021 from Wise Law on Twitter: Court sides with mentally disabled man after immigration hearing questions legitimacy of his marriageInternet harassment: Caplan v Atlas Prof. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the 80-20 National Asian American Educational Foundation, et al, in Support of Petitioner Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity, the American Civil Rights Institute, the National Association of Scholars, and Project 21 in Support of Petitioner Brief for Scholars of Econmics and Statistics in Support of Petitioner Brief for Southeastern Legal… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Recently on October 10, 2008, Connecticut became the third state to legalize same-sex marriage in Kerrigan v. the State Commissioner of Public Health in which the state Supreme Court struck down a statutory ban by a 4-3 decision. -- This Federalist Society panel will focus on the proper role of the judiciary. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm
(v) An individual to whom the person is related or was formerly related bymarriage. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
In 2016, responding to CACI’s argument that plaintiffs’ claims were non-justiciable under the political question doctrine, the Fourth Circuit reiterated its position in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 5:24 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:19 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]