Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2016, 6:04 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck examined if there was a coherent middle ground in the Apple vs. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:48 am
Levinson, in conversation with Steve Vladeck, a nationally recognized expert on the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and Gene Healy, distinguished author and expert on executive power, the role of the presidency, and federalism, will explore the relevance of The Federalist to today’s politics.Join the Brennan Center and ACS for an engaging discussion with one of America’s most distinguished constitutional scholars on… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:11 pm
However, according to Colonel Steve Warren, U.S. spokesman in Iraq, the outpost was kept a secret because the Pentagon wanted to give the Marines a chance to “become fully operational” and “ready to fight. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” Commentary comes from: Jeffrey Bellin, who at CNN writes that “Merrick Garland can help bring the Supreme Court together, pushing at least one of the three branches of government out of the political muck”; Ilya Shapiro, who at Forbes contends that the “Senate is fully within its rights, given the unique nature of this judicial vacancy, to fulfill its ‘advice and consent’ function by telling the president that we should let this fall’s election determine… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:15 pm
President Obama's Guantanamo closure report begins with a false statement and proceeds make a series of valid points. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
If the following sounds familiar, it is largely the argument in the National Institute of Military Justice’s amicus brief, co-authored by Steve Vladeck. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
Steve Vladeck at PrawfsBlawg addresses the issue of Scalia’s votes in cases for which a decision has not yet been released. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck For those who teach and write about the federal courts and/or constitutional law, Alexander Bickel’s 24-page review of how the Voting Rights Act fared in the Supreme Court – a lucid dissection of South Carolina v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Ben summarized his and Steve Vladeck’s piece in the Washington Post, which offered their own formula to break the executive-legislative stalemate on Guantanamo. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:29 am
Steve Vladeck and I have a piece in the Washington Post today offering a formula to break the executive-legislative stalemate on Guantanamo—one predicated on the idea of designating a permanent site in the United States for all current detentions and whatever future detentions subsequent administrations may engage in. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
Steve Vladeck previewed the habeas case Duncan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:36 am
In its brief, the government responds directly to an amicus brief from the National Institute of Military Justice (NIMJ), co-authored by Steve Vladeck. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog, with commentary coming from Steve Vladeck at PrawfsBlawg and Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:45 pm
" Steve Vladeck has this post today at "PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 6:21 am
(Steve Vladeck shares some of his angst about this season here.) [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm
” At Just Security, Steve Vladeck discusses a petition filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and “a very important (but little noticed) circuit split over the scope of FOIA’s ‘Exemption 7(F),’ which allows the government to withhold ‘records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information … could reasonably be expected to… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
"A FOIA Circuit Split That the Supreme Court Needs To Resolve": Steve Vladeck has this post today at the "Just Security" blog. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:13 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Amanda Frost and Steve Vladeck discuss standing and the challenge to President Barack Obama’s immigration policy, urging the Court to “accept the case, hold that the plaintiffs lack standing, and send it back to the lower courts with instructions to dismiss. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:40 pm
" Steve Vladeck has this post at "PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
