Search for: "Telephone Cases" Results 941 - 960 of 26,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2022, 6:31 am
In In re Cellular Telephone Partnership Litigation (Mar. 9, 2022), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T, Inc., which was the 98.12% controlling partner of Salem Cellular Telephone Company (the “Partnership”), froze out the minority partners by acquiring the Partnership’s assets and liabilities and then liquidating the Partnership. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:16 am
In some cases, the client volunteers that there's no way in hell that he can come up with the bucks needed to repay anything (often including my legal fees). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
This was posted on the court's website yesterday:The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, reminds parties and counsel that if they have concerns about health issues, but are still able to argue their case, they may notify the court at 415-865-7300 to arrange for oral argument via teleconference.The 5th DCA has this:For those who may be concerned about traveling at this time, we encourage you to consider appearing telephonically for oral argument. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:17 am by David Oscar Markus
  Individual judges may continue trial specific deadlines in civil cases in the exercise of their discretion. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 5:30 am by Jordan Rothman
[Page Six] * A robo lawyer app has been developed to sue robocallers under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Robert Loeb, Katie Kopp, Melanie Hallums
Clerk's office staff will personally contact counsel and discuss individual cases, including possible telephonic argument for cases that the panels determine require argument. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Ohio Bangladesh telephonic wedding case I blogged about below mentioned "Mohammedan law," which struck me as unusual and archaic; and indeed a Google Ngrams search supports this. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:19 pm by Howard Friedman
The initial search warrant in the case was based on telephone calls to a crisis hotline which were later determined to be hoax calls. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:16 pm
She got the red marks when she tripped over a telephone cord. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:19 pm by Howard Friedman
 The initial search warrant in the case was based on telephone calls to a crisis hotline which were later determined to be hoax calls. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:27 am
The bill would have placed a $15 surcharge on telephonic appearances to pay for the program. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:57 am
In cases involving high speed collisions, the wreckage can be inscrutable to the common eye and the family's grief is compounded by their inability to understand how the crash could have occurred. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:28 am by Dave Wingate, Senior Life Care Planning
This allows homebound older people who need a civil protection order to petition for the order and talk to a judge about the case over the telephone. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:13 am by Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.
Florida, Georgia and Alabama consumers need not worry about a recent case out of the Second Circuit, Reyes v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
In a decision last week, the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court's ruling in a trademark case in favor of the defendant, finding the defendant's use of the vanity telephone number "1-800-SKI-VAIL" for marketing services relating to the ski industry was not likely to be confused with the Plaintiff's service mark registration for "VAIL" encompassing the gamut of commercial recreational activities and accompanying… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
On June 23, 2008, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:11 pm
David Ausburn, 39, was charged with using a telephone and computer between January and February 2003 to induce a minor to have sex. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:40 pm by Kevin Khurana
   The plaintiff in Pinkard alleged that when filling her prescription at one of Wal-Mart’s pharmacies, a Wal-Mart employee stated that the plaintiff’s phone number was needed “in case there were any questions that came up. [read post]