Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 941 - 960 of 8,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-1367 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:49 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS), a directorate of  United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), is set to embark on another foray of surprise visits to Corporate America, seeking to determine whether employers petitioning for work-based immigration benefits have kept their word. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142-43 (9th Cir. 2010) (finding the expenses incurred by attorney for lodging and meals during oral argument and post-argument mediation to be “necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of petitioner); Dawson, 2014 WL 4748512, at * 8 (awarding petitioner expenses for, inter alia, the cost of a private investigator to locate the abducted children in the United States); Saldivar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 7:38 am
Fortunately, the United States has laws that provide protection in these situations. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner realized that Respondent and the children had left the Dominican Republic for the United States at some point in September 2021. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 10:02 am by Joel R. Brandes
New York, 2024) the district court denied the Petition of Sebastien Funez Mene which sought the repatriation from the United States to Poland of the parties’ only child, a minor referred to herein as “BFS,” who is alleged to have been unlawfully removed from Poland by Respondent in early 2022. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 3:13 pm by Orin Kerr
One reason may be that Riley has more representative facts but Wurie lets the United States play a larger role: As petitioner, DOJ can file a full length merits brief, a reply brief, and get 30 minutes of oral argument, instead of filing an amicus brief and getting the expected 10 minutes of the state’s oral argument time. [read post]