Search for: "US v. London"
Results 941 - 960
of 3,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
Pendergest-Holt v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court case of Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:58 pm
City of New London and in state cases such as Goldstein v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm
The fallout from Pfizer's departure from New London. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
They’re Being Used Anyway. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
Thus the Case of the Week is Jordan v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The relevant market was identified by the judge as "high quality, high-end restaurants in London" [49].Zuma the dog (probably) c/o DineinWithZuma.comUse of a signAlthough the defendants accepted that they were using DINE IN WITH ZUMA and the distinctive dog device as signs because they were fixed to packaging and offered for sale via the website.There was some dispute as to whether use of ZUMA alone was use of a sign. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:22 am
Winfrey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:45 am
She agreed with Mr Mitchell in writing to provide her name on applications for mortgages over a number of properties in which Mr Mitchell had, or would have, an interest, including a leasehold flat in London. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
New London. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
[4] e.g. s9 Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1976 and s74 London Local Authorities Act 2007. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:04 pm
Council and Commisssion and in Case T-315/01 Kadi v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:23 am
The claimant had traded as "Strip" in London since 2005 and was the only local business to do so. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
The decision was made two months ago, but I think the written opinion has just become available, as GW v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), apply, and what does such scrutiny encompass? [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) in sanctioning the use of eminent domain for the benefit of a private developer, when the circumstances presented by the instant case exemplify the very bad faith, pretext, and favoritism that this Court warned could result if Kelo's safeguards were ignored? [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:58 am
– Justice Richard Palmer (the deciding vote in the groundbreaking Kelo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:47 pm
Indeed, every solicitor who had a litigation practice outside London used to have a firm of solicitors in London who acted as their London agents. [read post]
