Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 941 - 960 of 1,174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Case Law: DFT v TFD – super injunctions, again – Mark Thomson – Inforrm’s Blog: More on super-injunction, this time relating to a blackmail case involving a woman’s threats to make public information relating to a sexual relationship unless the man involved paid her substantial sums of money. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 9:05 pm by Michael Atkins
Hakim worked together to use the marks by using various “straw” persons and corporations. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
And finally, further news of Mark Stephens. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
Given the the same phrase – “in principle” – is used in the same context in Cosic (at [22], as quoted above), I don’t see that its use in Kay marks any departure of the Court from previous, erm, principle. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  We lack Mr Stephens’ crystal ball but it seems to us that the Government is approaching these issues with an open mind. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
The People) US Trade Marks & Domain Names Lessons in smart trademark management: Free licensing of the mark from Twitter (Techdirt) [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am by INFORRM
The case of Cragg v Stephens (2010 BCSC 1177) was an assessment of damages in a defamation case in British Columbia. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
It's getting on for five months since the Court of Justice of the European Union gave its ruling in Case C-278/08 Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni and trekking.at Reisen GmbH (see the IPKat here) -- the court's other ruling on the use of trade marks and other allusive symbols as keywords in the same week as it gave its famous ruling in the three Google France cases (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am by Gerard Magliocca
History (2007) (using Skowronek’s model to analyze judicial review). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
  The Times itself quoted Mark Stephens as complaining “People want the best quality information that is available, given in a neutral way. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices Stephen G. [read post]